Comparison of Serum Total IgA Levels in Severe and Mild COVID-19 Patients and Control Group.

BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to compare serum total IgA levels between severe and mild COVID-19 patients' groups and the control group. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 216 definite severe COVID-19 patients (as the inpatient group), 183 subjects with positive specific COVID-19 IgG with mild or no symptoms as the (outpatient group), and 203 healthy subjects with negative specific serology, as the control group were investigated. The cases' laboratory data were collected, and thereafter, statistical tests, including independent samples t test, ANOVA test, and post hoc test, were performed using SPSS software version 22. RESULT: The mean ± SD of IgA in all the included subjects was 2.23 ± 0.78 (g/L). According to the obtained results, there were statistically significant changes in IgA among the three study groups (P value < 0.05). This difference was significant between both outpatient and inpatient groups (P value < 0.05). The mean ± SD of serum IgG in all the subjects was calculated as 15.83 ± 5.73 (g/L). A strong statistically significant change was also seen in IgG among all three groups (P value < 0.001). Of note, there was a significant negative correlation between IgG and IgA total titers of the outpatient group (P value = 0.011*r = - 0.188). CONCLUSION: It was shown that the total serum IgA and IgG levels are significantly associated with the severity of COVID-19 infection. As well, we found that total serum IgA and IgG are associated with the severity of illness. Since a low level of IgA is asymptomatic and high frequent in Iran and other countries, we suggest the evaluation of serum IgA levels in high-risk people and strengthening immune system in subjects with a low level of IgA, in order to reduce the rate of death. In this regard, oral or nasal mucosal vaccines in combination with parenteral vaccination are recommended due to increasing immunity versus COVID-19 by further secretion of the IgA antibody and preventing virus transmission.

Olfactory Dysfunction in Patients Infected with 2019 Novel Coronavirus.

INTRODUCTION: The current study aimed at investigating the occurrence and features of olfactory dysfunction in patients with confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with laboratory and clinically confirmed COVID-19 infection were enrolled in this longitudinal study. They were managed in either the inpatient or outpatient setting. The demographic, clinical, and outcome data were retrieved from patients' medical records. Olfactory dysfunction features, including the onset pattern, duration, and recovery time were investigated. The visual analog scale (VAS) was utilized as a self-rating subjective measurement of olfactory function. RESULTS: According to the results, the mean age of the patients (n=502) was obtained at 46.8±18.5 years; moreover, 52.4% and 47.6% of cases were female and male, respectively. It was also revealed that 35.4% and 64.5% of the subjects were outpatients and hospitalized, respectively. Based on the findings, 178 (38.4%) subjects had olfactory dysfunction. The mean values of VAS in hyposmic patients were estimated at 2.5±2.5, 8.3 ±2.1, and 9.4±1.6 at the first evaluation, in 2 weeks, and after 1 month of follow-up (P<0.001). The onset of olfactory dysfunction was more suddenly (58.7%). The majority of cases experienced olfactory dysfunction at the same time as other symptoms 72(51.1%). Based on the results, 0.4% of subjects infected with COVID-19 had olfactory dysfunction as an isolated symptom. The olfactory dysfunction was recovered after 2 weeks in 18 (25.3%) anosmic and 37(46.8%) hyposmic patients. CONCLUSION: Olfactory dysfunction seemed to be an important symptom of COVID-19 infection. The occurrence of this disturbance as a transient self-limited condition was significantly higher among female subjects.